May 2000 What Is 
      It? In the early days of bus 
      design, transit officials pondered ways to overcome some of the bus' 
      inherent disadvantages as compared to street railway 
      cars.         
       The Third Rail and The Third Rail 
      logo are trademarks of The Composing Stack 
      Inc.. Return to The Third Rail Online Home Everything on this site is copyright © 2000 by The Composing 
      Stack Inc., except as otherwise noted. Last updated May 1, 2000
    
    
         
    
 
         
       
by Paul Matus
     One problem (to this day never fuly 
      resolved) was the limited seating capacity of buses relative to rail 
      vehicles. Another is the poorer ride associated with 
      buses. 
     A factor in addressing both 
      problems is the shorter wheelbase and length of buses necessitated by the 
      need to navigate city streets without the operational advantages of a 
      fixed guideway, which keeps rail vehicles within a known 
      pathway. 
     The requirement that buses have 
      a rear axle attached inflexibly to the chassis frame also makes the 
      problem worse, as the rear wheels follow the bus on a different pathway 
      from the front wheels, limiting buses' turning radius and therefore 
      overall length. A shorter bus obviously carries fewer 
      passengers. 
     In 1925 the Versace 
      Corporation of Albany, New York, demonstrated this innovative vehicle (or 
      weird contraption, depending on your point of view) on the streets of New 
      York's capital city. By building a bus on a railway style frame, and 
      equipping it with railway type trucks (albeit with 8-inch solid tires 
      instead of flanged wheels), the company hoped to convince transit 
      officials that they created the best of both 
      worlds. 
     The swiveling front and rear 
      trucks were said to allow this 44-seat, 38 foot long vehicle to turn 
      within a circle of only 47-1/2 foot diameter, including body 
      overhang. 
     The problem of powering these 
      swiveling trucks was solved by using electric motors powered by on-board 
      engines. 
     Despite its inventors' hopes and 
      efforts, these buses did not revolutionize highway transportation. Would 
      it be too cynical to observe that, back in the free enterprise era of 
      transportation, its failure didn't cost the taxpayers millions?  
      Both photos Electric Railway Journal. 
         
       
      Return to 
      rapidtransit.net Home
Materials 
      with other copyrights are used by permission.
All 
      rights reserved